With origins dating back to 1991, the Canadian nonprofit organization Momentum focuses on reducing poverty and strengthening the local economy.
Momentum also stewards the Aspire Calgary Financial Empowerment Collaborative (Aspire), a network of more than twenty organizations in Calgary, Alberta, that collaborate to deliver financial empowerment interventions and programming to Calgarians living on lower incomes. Beyond offering financial coaching services, matched savings programs, and RESP information, fourteen Aspire partners provide free tax clinics to low-income community members.
“More than ten thousand people a year are supported through the tax clinics,” said Aspire Leader Colin Bath. “On average, someone living on a lower income in Canada might get about $3,500 back after doing their taxes, which is substantial.”
Originally, the partners manually documented the tax files on paper, and then scanned the information and uploaded it to a SharePoint site. This method came with a broad range of problems.
“There wasn’t a lot of standardization around that process,” said Colin. “Some people used
multiple files for a single tax form. A lot of forms would get lost. They weren’t always readable.
There were also often access issues with SharePoint.” The inefficient, disordered process made it difficult to communicate to key stakeholders about Aspire’s successes. It also risked losing the tax clinics’ participation.
“Aspire tax clinics are based on the Community Voluntary Income Tax program,” said Colin. “If we don’t have an efficient, easy system that works for our hardworking partners, that can potentially influence a partner’s willingness to participate.”
Aspire sought a completely digital solution that its partners would find accessible and easy to use, regardless of users’ technological literacy. Substantial security measures and multiple language options were also priorities for the partners. Aspire worked with a consultancy that found five software options that might suit the partners’ criteria, and the one that resonated with the collaborative most was Forms On Fire.
“Forms On Fire was just more professional and comprehensive than the other offerings, which didn’t look as polished, easy to use, or robust,” said Colin. “Forms On Fire was far and away the clear winner that met the most criteria.”