Audits can feel overwhelming, but they are essential for keeping your business on track. Whether it's an internal audit or an external one, both play a key role in ensuring your operations are efficient and compliant.
But what's the difference between the two, and when should you use them?
In this article, we’ll break down the characteristics of internal and external audits, explain how they work, and explore which type of audit is best suited for different situations.
The main difference between an internal audit and an external audit comes down to who performs the audit and what the goal is.
Internal audits are conducted by a company’s own staff to evaluate and improve internal processes, while external audits are performed by third-party auditors to provide an independent review of financial statements or compliance.
In essence, they serve different purposes — internal audits help companies stay on track, and external audits offer an objective, outside perspective to meet regulatory or stakeholder requirements.
Since they have different goals, their implementation can vary significantly. The graphic below tries to summarize all of the main differences.
Before we outline when to use each, let’s take a closer look at these two types of audits separately.
An internal audit is a self-evaluation process that helps a company assess its operations, controls, and processes. It is designed to identify potential risks, uncover inefficiencies, and drive continuous improvement.
Internal audits are typically performed by employees within the organization — often on a recurring basis — to ensure that internal policies and procedures are being followed.
To streamline internal auditing, companies can use tools like Forms On Fire to build customized checklists and data collection forms. This also helps standardize the process, simplifying the comparison with past audit findings.
There are several types of internal audits, each focused on a specific area of the business. Below are the most common examples:
Internal audits are typically reported to management and key stakeholders within the company. The findings often come in the form of a detailed report that highlights any issues, inefficiencies, or risks discovered during the audit. This report may also include recommendations for improvements and a proposed timeline for addressing any identified weaknesses.
The outcomes of an internal audit can vary. If significant issues are found, the company may need to implement corrective actions, such as updating internal controls, refining processes, or providing additional employee training. In some cases, recurring problems can lead to more frequent audits or the involvement of external auditors for a deeper investigation.
Typical next steps after an internal audit include scheduling follow-up reviews to ensure that recommended changes are being implemented and are effective.
An external audit is an independent, objective review conducted by a third-party auditor, usually a certified public accounting (CPA) firm. The main purpose of an external audit is to validate the accuracy of a company’s financial statements or to ensure compliance with various regulatory standards.
Unlike internal audits, which are ongoing and more flexible, external audits are typically performed annually — or as required by law or stakeholders (such as investors or regulatory bodies).
The external audit process usually involves a thorough examination of the company’s financial records, controls, and accounting systems. Once completed, the audit results are reported to the company’s leadership and external stakeholders, offering an unbiased opinion on the financial health and compliance status of the organization.
While financial audits are the most common example, there are other types of external audits:
The results of external audits are usually compiled into a formal audit report, which is shared with company leadership and external stakeholders such as investors, regulatory bodies, or creditors. This report typically includes the auditor’s opinion on the accuracy and fairness of the company’s financial statements, as well as any significant findings or areas of concern.
If the external audit reveals serious issues, such as material misstatements or non-compliance with regulations, the company may face a range of consequences. These can include penalties, fines, or legal actions if regulatory requirements are not met. Additionally, a negative audit report could damage the company’s reputation or lead to a loss of investor confidence, which might impact funding opportunities.
Based on the findings, the company might need to take the appropriate corrective actions — revise financial records, improve internal controls, or address any compliance violations. After the issues have been resolved, the company may need to undergo follow-up audits to confirm that the corrective measures have been effectively implemented.
Asking whether internal or external audits are better is the wrong question — they’re not interchangeable, and each serves a different purpose.
Both are crucial for a well-rounded governance strategy. Instead of choosing one over the other, companies should see them as complementary tools that, when used together, provide a comprehensive understanding of business performance, risks, and compliance.
Internal audits are performed when an organization wants to:
External audits are typically conducted when an independent review is needed to ensure transparency and accountability. These situations include:
Forms On Fire is a no-code form builder you can use to digitize your auditing procedures, making it easier to track, document, and manage audit findings. You get access to features like:
By using Forms On Fire, you can increase audit accuracy and save valuable time — hitting two birds with one stone.
Want to learn more? Request a demo or start a free trial with Forms On Fire today.
Company
Contact
Platform
Resources
Use Cases
Industries